Which details from the text best support the analysis that the narrator is in awe of the city at night? select three options. “but it was not dark. everywhere there were lights.” “i thought to myself ‘this is a strong magic’ and trembled.” “that was a sight indeed—yes, that was a sight: i could not have seen it in the body—my body would have died.” “everywhere went the gods, on foot and in chariots.” “it was magic what they could do—it was magic what they did.
Which Details From The Text Best Support The Analysis That The Narrator Is In Awe Of The City At Night? Select Three Options. “But It Was Not Dark. Everywhere There Were Lights.” “I Thought To Myself ‘This Is A Strong Magic’ And Trembled.” “That Was A Sight Indeed—Yes, That Was A Sight: I Could Not Have Seen It In The Body—My Body Would Have Died.” “Everywhere Went The Gods, On Foot And In Chariots.” “It Was Magic What They Could Do—It Was Magic What They Did.
Best apk References website
Which Details From The Text Best Support The Analysis That The Narrator Is In Awe Of The City At Night? Select Three Options. “But It Was Not Dark. Everywhere There Were Lights.” “I Thought To Myself ‘This Is A Strong Magic’ And Trembled.” “That Was A Sight Indeed—Yes, That Was A Sight: I Could Not Have Seen It In The Body—My Body Would Have Died.” “Everywhere Went The Gods, On Foot And In Chariots.” “It Was Magic What They Could Do—It Was Magic What They Did.. Everywhere there were lights. b. The details from the text that best support the analysis that the narrator is in awe of the city at night are the descriptions of abundant light, the magical quality of the scene, and the presence.
1) What can you conclude about the narrator based on the passage? A from brainly.com
I thought to myself 'this is a. The details from the text that best support the analysis that the narrator is in awe of the city at night are the descriptions of abundant light, the magical quality of the scene, and the presence. Everywhere there were lights. b.
Details From The Text That Best Support The Analysis That The Narrator Is In Awe Of The City At Night Are:
But it was not dark. The details from the text that best support the analysis that the narrator is in awe of the city at night are the descriptions of abundant light, the magical quality of the scene, and the presence. Everywhere there were lights—lines of light—circles and blurs of light—ten.
[ Everywhere There Were Lights. ;
Everywhere there were lights. b. The three details from the text that best support the analysis that the narrator is in awe of the city at night are: I thought to myself 'this is a.
Everywhere There Were Lights.”** 2.
**“but it was not dark. To determine which details from the text support the analysis that the narrator is in awe of the city at night, we should look for phrases that express wonder, amazement, or strong emotional. Details from the text that best support the analysis that the narrator is in awe of the city at night are but it was not dark.
I Thought To Myself 'This Is A Strong.
The following details from the text best support the analysis that the narrator is in awe of the city at night:
